|
Re: Spider-Man 2 (2004)
| | Added by John Ulmer on 2004-06-30 16:32:45 |
This got rave reviews. 96% positive on Rotten Tomatoes last time I checked, with an average rating of 8.5/10, which is quite extraordinary. Doc Ock was my favorite villain from the series as a child -- hopefully the next installment will feature Venom.
I can't wait to see this - unfortunately it doesn't open up in the UK for another whole month.
|
|
|
Re: Spider-Man 2 (2004)
| | Added by Joe Rickey on 2004-06-30 17:50:51 |
I don't know how this film could possibly be anything but amazing, especially considering it's the best-reviewed movie of the year thus far. Can't wait to see it.
|
|
|
Re: Spider-Man 2 (2004)
| | Added by Gizmola on 2004-06-30 19:04:54 |
And with SII, they managed to get the great Alvin Sargent to work on the screenplay. That alone raises my interest.
|
|
|
Re: Spider-Man 2 (2004)
| | Added by Joe Rickey on 2004-07-02 23:56:44 |
SM2 has made over 60 million in two days, likely to have 130 mil. plus for the five day weekend, possibly as high as 160-175. I wonder if it'll overtake Shrek 2 for number 1 of the year.
|
|
|
Re: Spider-Man 2 (2004)
| | Added by carl langley on 2004-07-03 10:30:02 |
It will easily surpass Shrek 2, I mean 40 million dollars on a Wednesday, that has to say something. I'm expecting another $400 million dollar flick.
|
|
|
Re: Spider-Man 2 (2004)
| | Added by Victor (email, web) on 2004-08-07 23:24:19 |
My summation : 10 min of action and the rest is emotional drama.
It's spiderman, If I wanted to see a soap opera I wouldn't have shelled out 8 quid.
If there's a message to be sent across then please don't use a comic book character to do it.
|
|
Add new comment
All comments are owned by their posters.
Please e-mail [email protected] with complaints.
|
