|
Re: King Arthur (2004)
| | Added by Joseph Kastner (email, web) on 2004-07-07 22:32:29 |
I expected this to be a lot better but came away a bit disappointed. The review I wrote up touches on several things you noted as well, including the edited action sequences, which hurt the film severely in my opinion.
3.5 out of 5
|
|
|
Re: King Arthur (2004)
| | Added by James on 2004-07-08 07:04:28 |
Why still bother with filming this story when the ultimate film on the topic, namely "Excalibur" has already been made?
|
|
|
Re: King Arthur (2004)
| | Added by jaz (email) on 2004-08-15 15:56:08 |
i was expecting a large pile of shite after all the negative reviews,i hated the fact there was no magic in this movie or good acting but i would still give 3.5 out of 5 because its the spaghetti western version of king arthur and i enjoyed it for that.
|
|
Add new comment
All comments are owned by their posters.
Please e-mail [email protected] with complaints.
|
